Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2018
Abstract
Limited information exists on funding models for interprofessional education (IPE) course delivery, even though potential savings from IPE could be gained in healthcare delivery efficiencies and patient safety. Unanticipated economic barriers to implementing an IPE curriculum across programs and schools in University settings can stymie or even end movement toward collaboration and sustainable culture change. Clarity among stakeholders, including institutional leadership, faculty, and students, is necessary to avoid confusion about IPE tuition costs and funds flow, given that IPE involves multiple schools and programs sharing space, time, faculty, and tuition dollars. In this paper, we consider three funding models for IPE: (a) Centralized (b) Blended, and (c) Decentralized. The strengths and challenges associated with each of these models are discussed. Beginning such a discussion will move us toward understanding the return on investment of IPE.
Recommended Citation
Carney, Patricia A.; Bearden, David T.; Osborne, Molly L.; Driessnack, Martha; Stilp, Curt C.; Baggs, Judith Gedney; Austin, Jared P.; Tonning, Kristi; and Boyd, Jennifer, "Economic models for sustainable interprofessional education" (2018). Faculty Publications - College of Medical Science. 4.
https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/cms_fac/4
Comments
Originally published in Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2018. Volume 32. Issue 6. Pages 745-751.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2018.1509846