Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2020

Publication Title

Journal of Biomedical Analytics

Volume

3

Abstract

 Physical activity, especially when performed at moderate or vigorous intensity, has short- and long-term health benefits, but measurement of free-living physical activity is challenging. Accelerometers are popular tools to assess physical activity, although accuracy of conventional accelerometer analysis methods is suboptimal. This study developed and tested statistical learning models for assessing activity intensity from body-worn accelerometers. Twenty-eight adults performed 10-21 activities of daily living in two visits while wearing four accelerometers (right hip, right ankle, both wrists). Accelerometer placement is of crucial practical concern and this paper addresses this issue. Boosting, bagging, random forest and decision tree models were created for each accelerometer and for two-, three-, and four-accelerometer combinations to predict activity intensity. Research staff observations of activity intensity served as the criterion. Point estimates of error for the ankle accelerometer were 2.2-4.7 percentage points lower than other single-accelerometer placements, and the left wrist-ankle combination had errors 0.8-5.8 percentage points lower than other two-accelerometer combinations. Decision trees had poorer accuracy than the other models. Using an accelerometer worn on the lower limb, by itself or in combination with an upper-limb accelerometer, appears to offer optimal accuracy for activity intensity measurement.

Issue

1

First Page

27

Last Page

50

DOI

doi.org/10.30577/jba.v3i1.57

Comments

Originally published Journal of Biomedical Analytics. 2020. Volume 3. Issue 1. Pages 27–50.

https://doi.org/10.30577/jba.v3i1.57

Download

Share

COinS