Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2020

Publication Title

Journal of Sports Sciences

Volume

38

Abstract

Despite recent popularity of wrist-worn accelerometers for assessing free-living physical behaviours, there is a lack of user-friendly methods to characterize physical activity from a wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer. Participants in this study completed a laboratory protocol and/or 3–8 hours of directly observed free-living (criterion measure of activity intensity) while wearing ActiGraph GT9X Link accel- erometers on the right hip and non-dominant wrist. All laboratory data (n = 36) and 11 participants’ free- living data were used to develop vector magnitude count cut-points (counts/min) for activity intensity for the wrist-worn accelerometer, and 12 participants’ free-living data were used to cross-validate cut-point accuracy. The cut-points were: <2,860 counts/min (sedentary); 2,860–3,940 counts/min (light); and ≥3,941counts/min (moderate-to-vigorous (MVPA)). These cut-points had an accuracy of 70.8% for asses- sing free-living activity intensity, whereas Sasaki/Freedson cut-points for the hip accelerometer had an accuracy of 77.1%, and Hildebrand Euclidean Norm Minus One (ENMO) cut-points for the wrist accel- erometer had an accuracy of 75.2%. While accuracy was higher for a hip-worn accelerometer and for ENMO wrist cut-points, the high wear compliance of wrist accelerometers shown in past work and the ease of use of count-based analysis methods may justify use of these developed cut-points until more accurate, equally usable methods can be developed.

Issue

22

First Page

2569

Last Page

2578

DOI

doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1794244

Comments

Originally published in Journal of Sports Sciences. 2020. Volume 38. Issue 22. Pages 2569-2578.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1794244

Download

Share

COinS